Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Software patents vs. maths

  1. #1

    Default Software patents vs. maths

    FIGHT

    http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/n...dont-scale.ars

    Myhrvold is right that patent infringement is rampant among software firms. But in demanding that this infringement stop, Myhrvold isn't just declaring war on what he regards as Silicon Valley's patent-hostile culture. He's declaring war on the laws of mathematics. The legal research required for all software-producing firms to stop infringing patents would cost more than the entire revenue of the software industry. Even if firms were willing to pay the bill, there simply aren't enough patent lawyers to do the work. Firms infringe software patents because they don't have any other choice.
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  2. #2
    The main problem is that for some reason the 'novel' and 'non-obvious' criteria of a patent seem to not be applied in the case of software and people can apparently patent ridiculous bullshit that is the equivalent of a screenwriter trying to patent 'starting the episode in media res and then showing how it happened through flashbacks' or 'having a character flatly stating they will never do something, then cutting to them doing exactly that'. I was going to make a joke about how I was going to patent the for loop or something, but someone's already patented the linked list so now I am assuming that can't be far behind.
    The light that once I thought compassion still casting shadows in your action
    The words you shared were cold transactions that bring me to curse what you've done
    When you're up there absorbed in greatness with such success you've grown complacent
    I hope you scorch your many faces when you fly too close to the sun

  3. #3
    De Oppresso Liber CitizenCain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Bottom of a bottle, on top of a woman
    Posts
    3,423
    Quote Originally Posted by Steely Glint View Post
    The main problem is that for some reason the 'novel' and 'non-obvious' criteria of a patent seem to not be applied in the case of software
    Having a bunch of bureaucrats who are financially incentivized to grant patents try to play expert in every field has somehow gone horribly wrong... whodathought?
    "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."

    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

    -- Thomas Jefferson: American Founding Father, clairvoyant and seditious traitor.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •