Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Trauma and PTSD: what do we know, and why should non-Lewkowskians care?

  1. #1

    Default Trauma and PTSD: what do we know, and why should non-Lewkowskians care?

    We had our second major bout with PTSD today, directed by the best lecturer I've had the privilege of seeing live in five and a half years of uni. To celebrate this event--and in honour of this amazing Doc Brown/John Malkovich channeling wonderman--I hereby invite you to a relatively unstructured discussion about PTSD and trauma and their relevance to our lives.

    Did you know that the lifetime prevalence of PTSD (relatively narrowly defined by DSM-IV) may be around 7.8% in the US? Women are twice as likely victims as men (ca. 10%). Obviously most of these people are not war-veterans. There are many who meet the symptom criteria but not the A-criteria and who therefore don't get a PTSD diagnosis.

    In the gay thread, Lewkowski expressed some bizarre ideas about suicide that were based on the fact that most people don't commit suicide. You guys know how it is: most people experience crises but don't get depression; most smokers don't get lung-cancer; most soldiers don't get PTSD (or at least many don't).

    There are risk-factors and salutogenic factors that worsen or improve a person's chances of developing PTSD as well as influencing their prognosis:

    Some people are biologically predisposed, due to genetic and epigenetic factors.

    Traumas that occur in the public sphere (war, natural disaster, etc.) are better than those that occur in the private sphere (abuse by partner or parent, rape, mugging, etc).

    Activity is better than passivity: fighting or fleeing improves your chances; freezing and being helpless does the opposite.

    It's important that people see and react appropriately. Secret traumas--eg. the whole family knows you're being abused, but no-one says or does anything and pretends everything's fine--can sometimes make for long-repressed memories but generally have worse outcomes wrt PTSD.

    The ability to contextualise is extremely important both in preventing PTSD and in treating it. The context may be eg. a cruel fairytale, a shared belief about demonic possession, or even a conventional religion. Similarly, involvement--in society, or in a Cause--is beneficial.

    Haven't got my notes on me so I leave the stage to you
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  2. #2
    Walk it off, be a man
    In the future, the Berlin wall will be a mile high, and made of steel. You too will be made to crawl, to lick children's blood from jackboots. There will be no creativity, only productivity. Instead of love there will be fear and distrust, instead of surrender there will be submission. Contact will be replaced with isolation, and joy with shame. Hope will cease to exist as a concept. The Earth will be covered with steel and concrete. There will be an electronic policeman in every head. Your children will be born in chains, live only to serve, and die in anguish and ignorance.
    The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.

  3. #3
    I wonder what other things correlated to people who have had PTSD. Mainly because of all the hubub involving stats and disperate impact and such.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnaught View Post
    I wonder what other things correlated to people who have had PTSD. Mainly because of all the hubub involving stats and disperate impact and such.
    How do you mean?
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •