Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Major media actors who influence opinion on political matters?

  1. #1

    Default Major media actors who influence opinion on political matters?

    What sources (newspaper columns, programs, organisations, blogs, etc) do you consider to be relatively influential wrt shaping public opinion on political matters? Eg. the most respected, the greatest reach, the best ads, etc.
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  2. #2
    None. People watch/read what they already believe. They're rarely convinced by the media. The exceptions would be when their own views aren't well-formed and the media has a very simple and clear message (which isn't particularly often; an example of the media actually having an effect would be "children are dying in Africa").
    Hope is the denial of reality

  3. #3
    What does shape public opinion, then? It certainly isn't fact-based individual analysis
    In the future, the Berlin wall will be a mile high, and made of steel. You too will be made to crawl, to lick children's blood from jackboots. There will be no creativity, only productivity. Instead of love there will be fear and distrust, instead of surrender there will be submission. Contact will be replaced with isolation, and joy with shame. Hope will cease to exist as a concept. The Earth will be covered with steel and concrete. There will be an electronic policeman in every head. Your children will be born in chains, live only to serve, and die in anguish and ignorance.
    The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Nessus View Post
    What does shape public opinion, then? It certainly isn't fact-based individual analysis
    From my observation, peer pressure, mostly.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Nessus View Post
    What does shape public opinion, then? It certainly isn't fact-based individual analysis
    It's actually most strongly affected by events on the ground, though those tend to be interpreted in a rather simplistic manner.

    This is a very complex topic with lots of research on it by the way. There's a role for elites, peer pressure, the community, etc. There are also different types of opinion, some held more strongly than others, etc.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  6. #6
    Tbh I'm mostly wondering about influencing the fuzzy... ie. the opinions of those who are somewhat undecided, on matters that they know little about.
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  7. #7
    Also about how to steer the already-convinced, eg. liberal media guiding liberals on favoured topics and favoured arguments.
    "One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    None. People watch/read what they already believe. They're rarely convinced by the media. The exceptions would be when their own views aren't well-formed and the media has a very simple and clear message (which isn't particularly often; an example of the media actually having an effect would be "children are dying in Africa").
    I disagree with your characterization of media usage. As a channel flipper and insomniac, I'm anecdotal proof that one can watch the usual network programs, plus CNN (US and global versions)/MSNBC/CNBC/PBS/Fox/C-Span....and happen onto the occasional broadcasts of 'underground stuff' on obscure cable channels before they suddenly turn into paid programming.

    I'm also an AM/FM radio flipper, so I'll listen to NPR as well as Rush Limbaugh. I don't buy many newspapers these days, but they're all there on the newsstand---and scanning the front pages from Baltimore to LA is rather fun. (I've never had a vendor tell me to buy the papers I'm reading on my way to the cashier

    The internet means I can read all sorts of international news, and even rags. That doesn't mean my own views aren't well-formed, or that I'm looking for a very simple and clear "message". It just means I enjoy reading diverse sources, and seeing their presentations/perspectives. They often have their own "Debate and Discussion" going on, with op-ed writers quoting other news sources and criticizing those writers' analyses. The NYT and WSJ are big on that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •