Quote Originally Posted by GGT View Post

But today's modern digital surveillance is being defined according to previously defined physical surveillance standards. No, it doesn't mean any human operatives, spies, physical cameras or listening 'devices'. It means one computer program or software design can be overlooked, underestimated, and cause more damage than a thousand human moles.
I don't even. . .



for crissakes, GGT, what is it going to take for you to give me even the minor concession of keeping my words in the context of at least the post they were made in? Is it too much to ask for you to acknowledge the words I use directly modifying them (or which they are in turn modifying) when entering them into your stream of consciousness?