Peter Strzok

[Aimless]

Let’s make it even more simple.

Mueller removed him. Binary situation here.

A. It was appropriate to remove him.
B. It was inappropriate to remove him.

A or B?

Both A and B.

[Lewkowski]

Both A and B.

Let me guess you voted for John Kerry

[Aimless]

Let me guess you voted for John Kerry

It was appropriate to remove him from the investigation in order to avoid problems with the appearance of bias that may be highlighted by people who don't respect freedom of speech or the professionalism in organizations such as the FBI. It was inappropriate to throw him to the wolves before the matter was properly dealt with in an internal investigation, because his privately discussed opinions are perfectly legal.

Not long ago, the FBI was described as "Trumpland" by an agent, and multiple internal sources described a deep-seated bias, within the agency, against Clinton. By your reasoning, this bias should cast doubt on any investigation into Clinton's actions that may lead to an indictment. Is that what you're trying to argue?